Muhammad Tariq Azhar

  VSS non pensioners Special Article through ChatGPT **Special Article about VSS-2008 (Non Pensioners)** *Note: I am presenting once again, for the third time, an important special article about VSS Non-Pensioners that I wrote on July 18, 2020. VSS-2008 Non-Pensioners, please read it carefully.*   (Tariq) **April 21, 2024** **Attention VSS Non-Pensioners** *Note: I wrote and tweeted this important article on July 18, 2020 (the link to the tweet is provided at the end of this article). I wrote this article about PTCL employees who opted for VSS and retired without being granted a pension, despite having qualified service of ten years or more as per government pension regulations. However, despite these regulations, PTCL dismissed them without a pension. According to federal government pension laws, any retired government employee with qualified service of ten years or more is entitled to a pension under Section  AA-374  of the Government Service Regulations (GSR). How...

Sent from Rawalpindi Pakistan via iPad Email through ChatGPT **To:**  secretary@moitt.govt.pk    **CC:**  care@ptet.com.pk Dear Sir I am writing to draw your urgent attention to the plight of over 25,000 non-pensioner VSS-retired employees of PTCL and their widows. These individuals have been subjected to severe injustice, as they were forcibly retired through the Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) in 2008 without being granted their rightful pensions, despite having served the required tenure. Under Section 474 AA of the GSR, any government servant with ten or more years of qualified service is entitled to a pension upon retirement. However, PTCL's management unlawfully extended the required qualified service period from ten to twenty years, depriving thousands of employees of their rightful pensions. This action was a blatant violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by Clause 8 and Article 27 of the Constitution of Pakistan. As affirmed by the Supreme Court in...

 Article -99 of dated 18th August 2019 in english through ChatGPT-4 Registration in EOBI for Former PTCL Employees: Legal Obligations and Benefits Clarification: Since the establishment of PTCL (Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited) on January 1, 1996, it was a legal and mandatory obligation for PTCL to register all former employees of PTC (Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation), regardless of their category, in the EOBI (Employees' Old-Age Benefits Institution) from the same date, and to ensure that PTCL itself was also registered. Dear PTCL Colleagues, Assalamu Alaikum, In my previous Article-97, I addressed the fact that all former employees of PTC, who were transferred to PTCL upon its establishment on January 1, 1996, and became its employees, were not registered in the EOBI according to the law, neither by the company nor were they registered on their own. Instead of registering them, the company got involved in litigation, and when the Islamabad High Court rejected it...

 Article -97 dated 24th July 2019 in english through ChatGPT-4 Title: Rights of Retired PTCL Employees Regarding EOBI Registration Article-97 According to the directives of the Adjudication Authority of the Employees' Old-Age Benefits Institution (EOBI), former employees of PTCL who were part of PTCL before January 1, 1996, and were not timely registered in EOBI due to PTCL's negligence, what course of action should be taken now? Dear PTCL colleagues, Assalam-o-Alaikum, I have received numerous messages regarding what steps the former PTCL employees, who were part of PTCL on January 1 and later retired or left PTCL for any reason, should take now. I had previously explained this in detail in my Article 96, but perhaps some individuals were unable to read it due to its length or did not understand it. Nevertheless, I have simply pasted the relevant portions below so that you can carefully read them. "In this order, the court used the term "aggrieved employees," no...

 نوٹ: میں نے EOBI کے بارے میں جو تین آڑٹیکلز  96, 97, اور 99  جولائی 2019 کو اردو میں  تحریر کئیے تھے جنکو 15 اگست 2024 کو آپ لوگوں کے لئیے ایک بار پھر فیس بک اور واٹس ایپس پر اپلوڈ کئیے تھے انھی تمام تینوں آڑٹیکلز کو ChatGPT-4 کے زریعے انگلش میں ترجمعہ اور تصحیح اختصار  سے کرواکر  پیش کررھا ھوں. (طارق) Date 17-8-2024 Article -96  in dated 22th July2019  in english through ChatGPT-4 Title: Understanding EOBI Pension Eligibility for Retired PTCL Employees:  A Comprehensive Guide Note:Currently, PTCL's retired employees, who retired before July 1, 2012, are trying to understand why they are not receiving EOBI pensions. It is crucial for them to know that PTCL only registered those employees with EOBI who were part of PTCL on July 1, 2012. According to the Islamabad High Court's ruling on May 17, 2012, and as per the EOBI Act, PTCL was required to register all employees who transferred from the Corporation  to Company on January 1, 1996. Ad...

  Artice-182 Title: The Contentious Decision of the Islamabad High Court on 2nd November 2021: A Critical Legal Analysis Dear PTCL Colleagues, Assalam-o-Alaikum, It might be known to some that the division bench decision of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on 2nd November 2021 regarding PTI and PTCL inter-court appeals is highly controversial. In this regard, I penned a detailed article on 26th December 2021, thoroughly discussing the decision's flaws and why it is deemed contentious. [This Article 154 was reuploaded on my blog site on 19th July 2024, for public access]. The judgment, authored by Honorable Justice Aamer Farooq, was framed in the context of a Supreme Court ruling on 7th October concerning the case of Masood Bhatti & Others, where the appellants were civil servants due to their affiliation with grade 17 or higher positions. Thus, only employees of the former T&T in grade 17 or above were considered civil servants and hence entitled to government-declared pensio...

  موضوع : عنوان: اسلام آباد ہائی کورٹ کا 2 نومبر 2021 کا متنازعہ فیصلہ . . . ایک تجزیاتی قانونی تنقید عزیز پی ٹی سی ایل ساتھیو اسلام وعلیکم ھو سکتا ھے   کے لوگوں کے علم میں ھو   یا نہ ھو کے اسلام آباد ھائی کوڑٹ کے ڈویژن  بینچ کا ، پی ٹی آئی اور پی ٹی سی ایل کی انٹرا کوڑٹوں پر 2 نومبر 2021 فیصلہ نہایت ھی متنازعہ ( controversial )  تھا ۔ عدلیہ کا کردار، قانون کی تشریح اور اُس کے نفاذ میں، معاشرتی نظام اور شہریوں کے درمیان انصاف کی حالت کو مستحکم رکھنے کے لئے ناگزیر ہے۔ عدالتوں کا فیصلہ نہ صرف موجودہ مقدمات کے لئے بھرپور اثر رکھتا ہے، بلکہ آئیندہ آنے والے واقعات اور قانون سازی پر ایک فیصلہ کن اثر ڈالتا ہے۔ بالخصوص، اسلام آباد ہائی کورٹ کا یہ 2 نومبر 2021 کا فیصلہ ایک منفرد مثال ہے جس کی تنقیدی جائزہ لینا نہایت ضروری ہے۔ یہ فیصلہ متنازعہ اس لئے ہوا کیونکہ اس سے متعلق حقوق، آزادیوں، اور قانون کی حکمرانی کے بنیادی اصولوں کی تشریح اور تطبیق میں نئے سوالات کی ابتدا ہوئی۔ اس فیصلے کی باریکیوں میں جائزہ لینے کا مقصد اِن سوالات کی چھان بین کرنا اور اِس بحث کو فروغ دینا ہے ...