Article-235[Regarding Analysis on CRP-97/2025 by Google Gemini]

 Article-235[Regarding Analysis on CRP-97/2025 by Google Gemini] 

میرا سوال 

سپریم کوڑٹ نے ۱۰ جولائی ۲۰۲۵ کے فیصلے میں انکی CPLA-6023/2021  کو ڈسمس کردیا اور ھائی کوڑٹ کا فیصلہ  گورمنٹ والی پنشن  دینے کا۔ جس کے دینےکا شیڈول  نوے دن کے اندر دینے کا پی ٹی  ای ٹی نے عدالت کے حکم پر عمل کرتے ھوۓ ٹائیملی شیڈول بھیج دیا اور  اور ایک لسٹ بھی بھیج پنشن دینے کی یکم نومبر ۲۰۲۵ دینے کا کہا ھے۔ ان انھوں نے صرف ان ریسپونڈنس کے نام بھیجے جو ٹی اینڈ ٹی میں سول سرونٹ بھرتی ھوئیے تھے انکی نظر میں وھی گورمٹ کی    کی پنشن لینے کا حقدار ھیں۔ آپ یہ مجھے بتائیں کے یہ CRP  ڈالنے کے بعد وہ  پنشن دینے سے رک جائیں گے۔ یا آپ سمجھتے ھیں وہ  یہ دیں گے۔ھمارے گروپس میں انھوں  صرف  20 میں سے  4   ریسپونڈنٹس پی ٹی سی ایل  پٹیشنرز  کو   گورمنٹ والی پنشن  دینے عدالت کو بتایا ھے۔کیا وہ اس   پر عمل کریں گے یا نھیں اس  

سی آرپی  سے ایسا کچھ نظر آتا ھے یا نھیں ۔ 

پلیز اسکا جواب انگلش میں دیں

جواب

The issue you have highlighted is a classic legal strategy aimed at delaying or limiting the execution of a court order, and your concerns about the payment are valid and common in complex litigation like this.

Here is an analysis of the situation and the likely outcome, based on the information you provided and the nature of the legal process.

⚖️ Analysis of PTET's Civil Review Petition (CRP) and Pension Payment

1. The Legal Status of the Pension Payment Obligation

The Supreme Court's decision on July 10, 2025, dismissing PTET's CPLA No. 6023/2021 (as confirmed by the news search) means the following:

 * The original High Court Judgment that granted the Government-scale pension benefits to the Petitioners stands affirmed (is upheld).

 * The obligation on PTET/PTCL to pay these pensions is now a Supreme Court directive, with a 90-day compliance deadline.

Key Principle: Filing a Review Petition (CRP) does not automatically constitute a stay (a halt) on the execution of the original judgment. PTET would have had to file a specific application for a stay (CMA for suspension/stay of the impugned order) along with the CRP, which the Supreme Court would have to grant formally.

2. Will PTET Stop the Pension Payment?

Based on the information you provided:

| Scenario | Likelihood | Reason |

|---|---|---|

| Stopping All Payment | Low to Moderate | If the Supreme Court has not granted a stay order on the execution of the July 10, 2025, judgment, PTET is legally bound to proceed with the payment schedule as ordered. Stopping payment without a stay would expose them to Contempt of Court proceedings. |

| Delaying Payment (Beyond Nov 1, 2025) | Moderate to High | PTET's primary goal with the CRP is to secure a stay order. Even without a formal stay yet, the mere pendency of the CRP provides them with leverage to claim administrative difficulty or seek a short-term extension from the Court, especially given the "complex and time-consuming" data verification they claimed in their July 2025 PSX filing (see search results). |

The CRP is a clear signal of intent by PTET that they intend to resist or limit the financial obligation. However, until the Supreme Court accepts the CRP for hearing and explicitly suspends the execution, the payment order remains in force.

3. PTET's Action: Limiting Payment to 4 out of 20 Respondents

PTET informing the Court that only 4 of the 20 respondents (the original T&T Civil Servants) are entitled to the government pension is a strategic and direct violation of the spirit of the Supreme Court's July 10, 2025, order.

| Action | Implication for Your Group | Legal Recourse |

|---|---|---|

| Limiting Payment | This confirms the core argument of the CRP: PTET only believes the T&T Civil Servants are entitled. They are trying to execute the judgment selectively based on their preferred interpretation, before the Court can rule on the CRP. | Your lawyer must immediately file a Contempt of Court Petition (or an application for execution/clarification) before the Supreme Court, highlighting this partial and selective non-compliance with the July 10, 2025, directive. |

4. Conclusion: Impact of the CRP

The CRP does not automatically stop the payment, but it will:

 * Create a Delay: It forces the Court to rehear the matter, which will inevitably push the final resolution and, potentially, the comprehensive payment schedule back.

 * Provide a Legal Excuse for Partial Compliance: By filing the CRP and simultaneously submitting a partial payment list (only 4 out of 20), PTET is using the pending review as a shield to justify its selective interpretation of the July 10, 2025, order.

 * Focus the Legal Battle: The battle now shifts to the maintainability of the CRP and the contempt of court caused by the selective payment.

⏭️ Next Step for Your Lawyer

Your lawyer must not wait for the outcome of the CRP. The best course of action would be:

 * IMMEDIATELY File an Application for Contempt/Execution: File a petition before the Supreme Court stating that PTET has willfully violated the clear orders of the Court dated July 10, 2025, by submitting a selective list and only acknowledging a fraction of the beneficiaries, while the judgment did not distinguish between the petitioners in that manner.

 * Move for Early Hearing of the CRP: Simultaneously, request the Chief Justice's office to fix the Review Petition (CRP 497/2025) for an early hearing to resolve the matter of the Stay Application (if one was filed) and the maintainability of the review itself.