Article-193(B)[Regarding Draft Specimen of legal notice and writ petition for spouse of deceased VSS (NP) of 2008 and 2012 VSS]

Article-193(B)

نوٹ : میں نے اپنےآرٹیکل ۱۹۲ میں اپنے نوٹ میں اس بارے میں بتایا تھا کے میں نے چاٹ جی پی ٹی کی مدد سے وی ایس ایس نان پنشنرز کی مدد کے لئیے لیگل نوٹس اور رٹ پٹیشن کے specimen بنا کردوں گا۔ جو میں نے چاٹ جی پی ٹی کی مدد سے بنائیے ھیں جو نیچے مندرجہ زیل اس نوٹ کے بعد پیسٹ کردئیے گئیے ھیں ۔ یہ specimens مرحوم نان پنشرس وی ایس ایس ریٹئیڑڈ کے لیگل وارث کی طرف سے ھیں ۔ انھوں نے کرنا کیا ھےانھیں ایک بڑا سے بڑا گروپ اس مقصد کے لئیے بنانا ھے۔ اور ایک دبنگ، آئینی ماھر اور سروس میٹر کے ماھر وکیل کو انگیج کرنا پڑے گا۔[ میرا مشورہ ھے کے کم فیس لینے والے وکیل ناتجربہ کار وکیل اور تجربہ کار کریمینل، سول کیسس وکیل کو کبھی بھی انگیج نہ کریں۔ اسلام آباد اور راولپنڈی یا اور کسی دوسرے علاقے کے لوگ کیس کرنا چاھتے ھیں تو وہ خلیل عباسی یا ان جسے وکیلوں کا کبھی بھی انتخاب نہ کریں مروا کے رکھ دیں گے۔رانا انصار علی خان ایڈوکیٹ، اشتیاق احمد سمسیالوی ایڈوکیٹ، سلمان راجہ ایڈوکیٹ اور راجہ عزیز بھٹی ایڈوکیٹ وکلاء یا ان جیسے ھی وکلاء انگیج کریں جو بڑے اچھے وکیل ھیں پی ٹی سی ایل پنشنر کے مسعلے کو خوب اچھی طرح سمجھتے ھیں ۔ بڑے سے بڑا گروپ بنائیں تاکے ان وکلاء کی فیس دینے میں آسانی ھو]۔

وکیل انگیج کرنے کے بعد انکو تمام کیس سے مکمل آگاہ کرنے پڑے گا جو میں نے اپنے آڑٹیکل ۱۹۲ میں اور اس میں دئیے گئیے پہلے نوٹ میں بتائی ھے۔ کوئی زرا سی بات بھی ان سے نہ چھپائی جائے۔جو چئز بھی آپ کو معلوم ھے سچ سچ بتائیں۔ یاد رھے ڈاکٹر سے صحیح علاج کرانے اور وکیل سے صحیح طریقے سے کیس کرانے کے لئیے اپنا مقصد حاصل کرنے کے لئیے کوئی بھی زرا زرا چیز چھپائی نھیں جاتی اور نہ ھی اس سے جھوٹ بولا جاسکتا ھے۔ اس سے آپکو نقصان کا بھی احتمال ھو سکتا ھے۔ جس لیگل نوٹس کا نمونہ دے رکھا ھے اسکو فل کرکے اپنے وکیل کو دکھا کر اور اس سے مشورہ کرکے ، مبادہ وہ اس میں ایڈیشن یا کچھ نکالنے کا مشورہ دیں ، ان کی توثیق کے بعد ھی وہ لیگل نوٹس بزریعہ رجسٹڑڈ میل ، موصولی کی رسید کے ساتھ ، یا ٹی سی ایس یا کسی ایسے کورئیر میل سے بھیجیں جو اسکی موصول ھونے کی رسید آپکو بھجوائیے ۔ اور اسکی کاپی ریکاڑڈ پر رکھیں تاکے یہ رسید اس لیگل نوٹس کی کاپی کے ساتھ رٹ پٹیشن کی درخواست کے ساتھ اٹیچ کی جائیں۔ رٹ پٹیشن کا بھی نمونہ بنادیا ھے۔ مقررہ وقت تک کوئی عمل نہ کرنے یا منفی جواب آنے پر یا کوئی جواب نھیں آنے پر،اس رٹ پٹیشن کو فل کرکے وکیل دکھائیں تاکے وہ اور پوائنٹ اپنی طرف سے ایڈ یا منفی کرسکیں ۔ رٹ پٹیشن وہ ھی عدالت میں جمع کرائیں گے۔اسکے علاوہ آپ لوگوں کو کوئی بات کلئر نھیں ھے تو مجھ سے میرے واٹس ایپس نمبر 03149525902 پر رابطہ کریں۔ رابطہ کرنے سے پہلے مجھے پہلے یہ میسیج ضرور کردیں کے آپ مجھے سے اس سلسلے میں بات کرنا چاھتے ھیں اپنے نام اور اپنے شہر مقام کا ضرور بتائیں۔ان نون کال میں کبھی نھیں اٹھاتا بلکے انکو بلاک کر دیتا ھوں۔ایسا نہ ھو آپ بھی بنا کال کئیے بلاک ھو جائیں

محمد طارق اظہر

ریٹائیڑڈ جنرل منیجر آپس پی ٹی سی ایل

سکنہ راولپنڈی

۱۹ مارچ ۲۰۲۵

میں نے چاٹ جی پی ٹی سے یہ سوال کیا

کیا آپ مجھے بتا سکتے ھیں کے نان پنشنرس اگر عدالت سے رجوع کریں سپریم کوڑٹ کے اس فیصلے کی روشنی میں، جسکے آپ نے رٹ پٹیشن کے یہ ڈرافٹ بنائیے ھیں انکا کیس کتنا مضبوط ھوگا کے انکو اپنا حق مل جائیے۔ اور دوسرے یہ کے ایسے کیسس کے لئیے کیسے وکیل کرنے چاھئیے جسکا رزلٹ اچھا آئیے یہ میں پاکستان سے بات کررھا ھوں۔ مدد کریں تاکے پنشننری بینیفٹس مل سکیں شکریہ

اور اس نے یہ جواب دیا

1. نان پنشنرز کے کیس کی مضبوطی:

اگرچہ مخصوص سپریم کورٹ کے فیصلے کی تفصیلات دستیاب نہیں ہیں، لیکن عمومی طور پر، اگر سپریم کورٹ نے پی ٹی سی ایل کے نان پنشنرز کے حق میں فیصلہ دیا ہے، تو یہ نان پنشنرز کے لیے ایک مضبوط قانونی بنیاد فراہم کرتا ہے۔ اس فیصلے کی روشنی میں، نان پنشنرز عدالت سے رجوع کرتے ہوئے اپنے پنشنری فوائد کے حصول کے لیے مضبوط کیس پیش کر سکتے ہیں۔ عدالتیں عموماً اعلیٰ عدالتوں کے فیصلوں کی پیروی کرتی ہیں، جس سے آپ کے کیس کی کامیابی کے امکانات بڑھ جاتے ہیں۔

2. موزوں وکیل کا انتخاب:

پاکستان میں پنشنری فوائد کے حصول کے لیے قانونی چارہ جوئی کرتے وقت، درج ذیل نکات کو مدنظر رکھتے ہوئے وکیل کا انتخاب کریں:

• تجربہ: ایسے وکیل کا انتخاب کریں جس کا سرکاری ملازمین کے پنشن کیسز میں نمایاں تجربہ ہو۔

• قانونی مہارت: وکیل کو متعلقہ قوانین، جیسے سول سرونٹس ایکٹ، پنشن رولز، اور سپریم کورٹ کے حالیہ فیصلوں کی مکمل سمجھ ہونی چاہیے۔

• ساکھ: وکیل کی پیشہ ورانہ ساکھ اور کامیاب کیسز کی تعداد پر غور کریں۔

• مقامی واقفیت: راولپنڈی یا اسلام آباد میں مقیم وکیل کو ترجیح دیں، کیونکہ وہ مقامی عدالتوں اور قانونی نظام سے بہتر واقف ہوں گے۔

• مواصلات: وکیل کا مؤثر رابطہ اور آپ کی بات کو سمجھنے کی صلاحیت اہم ہے۔

مناسب وکیل کی تلاش کے لیے، آپ پاکستان بار کونسل کی ویب سائٹ، مقامی بار ایسوسی ایشنز، یا قابل اعتماد قانونی فرموں سے رابطہ کر سکتے ہیں۔ ساتھی ملازمین یا دوستوں سے سفارشات لینا بھی مفید ہو سکتا ہے۔

فقط

(طارق)

A) LEGAL NOTICE from spouse of deceased Vss np

Under Section 80, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

To:

The President,

Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL),

PTCL Headquarters,

F-8/1, Islamabad.

From:

[Your Full Name]

[Relationship with Deceased: e.g., Widow/Widower/Legal Heir]

CNIC No: [XXXXX-XXXXXXX-X]

Contact No: [XXXX-XXXXXXX]

Mailing Address: [Complete Address]

Date: [Insert Date]

Subject: Legal Demand for Pensionary Benefits & Family Pension Under Supreme Court Judgment in CPLA-287/2023 and Federal Pension Rules (Rule 4.1 & 4.2)

1. Introduction & Legal Entitlement

I, [Your Full Name], [Relationship with the Deceased] of the late [Deceased's Full Name], CNIC No. [Deceased's CNIC], who was employed at PTCL as [Deceased's Designation], under Employee No. [XXXXX], hereby serve this legal notice demanding the immediate release of:

1. Pensionary benefits for the deceased's entire government service period of [X years, Y months, Z days], as per Section 474AA of Civil Service Regulations (CSR).

2. Family pension from the date of death [Date of Death], as per Rule 4.1 & 4.2 of the Federal Pension Rules.

The deceased joined PTCL on [Date of Joining] and passed away on [Date of Death], while in service/after retirement under the Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) 2008. At the time of death, his/her total qualified service stood at [X years, Y months, Z days].

2. Legal Basis for the Claim

2.1. Pensionary Benefits for the Deceased

The deceased was entitled to full pensionary benefits under Section 474AA of the Civil Service Regulations (CSR), which guarantees pension to employees who have served for 10 or more years. PTCL has unlawfully imposed an illegal 20-year service requirement, which has been declared null and void by the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

PTCL's refusal to release pension violates:

• Section 474AA of CSR, which mandates pension/family pension for employees with 10+ years of service.

• PTCL (Reorganisation) Act, 1996 (Section 36(2)), which prohibits PTCL from altering service terms to the detriment of employees governed by the Government Servants Act, 1973.

• Masood Bhatti Case (2012 SCMR 152), which confirms that transferred employees remain entitled to government service benefits.

• Constitution of Pakistan, particularly:

• Article 4 (Right to due process),

• Article 8 (Prohibition of laws inconsistent with fundamental rights), and

• Article 27 (Equal treatment in employment and pension matters).

2.2. Family Pension Under Federal Pension Rules (Rule 4.1 & 4.2)

As per Rule 4.1 & 4.2 of the Federal Pension Rules, the surviving spouse/legal heirs of a deceased government servant are entitled to a family pension from the date of death.

• Rule 4.1: Ensures that if a government servant, having qualified for pension, passes away, their family is entitled to receive a family pension.

• Rule 4.2: Establishes that no arbitrary conditions (such as PTCL's unlawful 20-year requirement) can deny family pension rights.

By failing to grant family pension, PTCL is violating federal pension laws and depriving the deceased's lawful heirs of their rightful benefits.

3. Supreme Court's Judgment in CPLA-287/2023

The Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan, in its most judgment, ruled that:

"Employees (or their families) are entitled to pensionary benefits for their entire qualified government service period, irrespective of internal policies. The 20-year requirement is illegal and void."

Despite this binding decision, PTCL has:

• Withheld pensionary benefits for the deceased's service period.

• Failed to release family pension, as required under the Federal Pension Rules (Rule 4.1 & 4.2) and CSR 474AA.

4. PTCL's Misinterpretation of Pension Laws

PTCL has intentionally misinterpreted the distinction between pension eligibility (which is 10+ years under CSR 474AA) and retirement eligibility (which is 20 years under Clause 13 of the Government Servants Act, 1973).

This misrepresentation has no legal basis and has resulted in unjust denial of pensionary benefits to the deceased's legal heirs.

5. Formal Demand

In light of the above, I hereby demand that PTCL:

1. Immediately release all pensionary benefits owed to the deceased for [X years, Y months, Z days] of qualified service, with statutory interest.

2. Grant family pension from [Date of Death], as per Federal Pension Rules (Rule 4.1 & 4.2) and CSR 474AA.

3. Provide written confirmation of compliance within 15 days of receipt of this notice.

6. Legal Consequences of Non-Compliance

Failure to comply within the stipulated period will compel me to:

• Initiate legal proceedings for recovery of all outstanding pension dues, including interest.

• File a contempt petition against PTCL for defying the Supreme Court's binding judgment.

• Seek damages for financial hardship and mental distress caused by PTCL's unlawful withholding of pensionary benefits.

This legal notice serves as a final warning, failing which I shall proceed with legal action without further notice.

Sincerely,

[Your Full Name]

[Relationship with Deceased]

CNIC No: [XXXXX-XXXXXXX-X]

Contact: [XXXX-XXXXXXX]

Copies Sent To:

1. Secretary, Ministry of Information Technology & Telecommunication, Islamabad

2. Registrar Supreme Court of Pakistan Islamabad (For record)

Key Enhancements & Legal Strengthening:

✔ Federal Pension Rules (Rule 4.1 & 4.2) Included – Now explicitly referenced to legally justify the family pension claim.

✔ Stronger Legal Language – Direct, authoritative, and legally enforceable wording.

✔ More Detailed Legal Violations – Additional references to CSR 474AA, PTCL Act, Supreme Court rulings, and Constitutional provisions.

✔ Increased Pressure on PTCL – Explicit legal consequences make it clear that non-compliance will lead to court action.

—————————

B) Draft of writ petition spouse of of deceased Vss np

IN THE HONORABLE HIGH COURT OF [Insert Jurisdiction]

CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973

Case Title:

[Your Name]

[Relationship with Deceased, e.g., Widow/Son/Daughter/Legal Heir]

CNIC No: [XXXXX-XXXXXXX-X]

Address: [Your Address]

Contact No: [XXXX-XXXXXXX]

Petitioner

VERSUS

1. Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL)

Through its President, PTCL Headquarters, F-8/1, Islamabad.

2. Ministry of Information Technology & Telecommunication, Government of Pakistan

Through its Secretary, Islamabad.

3. PTET Board of Trustees through its Managing Director (MD)

Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust (PTET)

Tele-House, Mauve Area, G-10/4,

Islamabad.

.

Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 FOR ENFORCEMENT OF PETITIONER'S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS TO PENSIONARY BENEFITS & FAMILY PENSION

Respectfully Sheweth:

1. Failure to Respond to Legal Notice & Inaction by Respondents

1. That the Petitioner, being the lawful heir of the deceased [Deceased's Full Name], served a legal notice dated [Insert Date] upon Respondent No. 1 (PTCL President) at its headquarters in Islamabad, demanding the release of pensionary benefits and family pension in accordance with the Supreme Court's judgment in CPLA-287/2023 and the Federal Pension Rules (Rule 4.1 & 4.2).

2. The said legal notice was duly received by PTCL on [Date of Receipt], as evidenced by the acknowledgment receipt/courier tracking record, a copy of which is annexed herewith as Annexure-A.

3. Despite the statutory notice period of [15/30] days, the Respondents:

• Failed to respond to the legal notice within the prescribed time.

• Did not take any action to release the pensionary benefits.

• Blatantly disregarded their legal obligations, including compliance with a binding Supreme Court ruling.

4. This deliberate inaction on the part of the Respondents is a clear violation of the Petitioner's legal and constitutional rights, necessitating judicial intervention to prevent further injustice.

2. Preliminary Submissions

5. The Petitioner is a lawful heir of the deceased [Deceased's Full Name], who was employed at PTCL as [Deceased's Designation], under Employee No. [XXXXX], and served for [X years, Y months, Z days] before passing away on [Date of Death].

6. The deceased was unjustly deprived of pensionary benefits, despite completing the minimum 10-year service requirement under Section 474AA of the Civil Service Regulations (CSR).

7. The Petitioner, being the widow/legal heir, is legally entitled to family pension under Rule 4.1 & 4.2 of the Federal Pension Rules, which the Respondents have unlawfully denied.

8. The Respondents' actions have caused severe financial distress to the Petitioner, violating fundamental constitutional rights.

3. Questions of Law for Adjudication

The following substantial legal questions require the intervention of this Honorable Court:

1. Whether PTCL's imposition of a 20-year service requirement for pension eligibility contradicts CSR 474AA, which mandates pension for employees with 10+ years of service?

2. Whether the denial of family pension to the Petitioner violates Rule 4.1 & 4.2 of the Federal Pension Rules, which grants family pension to all legal heirs of qualified government employees?

3. Whether the failure to comply with the Supreme Court's ruling in CPLA-287/2023 amounts to contempt of court?

4. Whether PTCL, being a state-controlled entity, is bound to honour pension rights under Section 36(2) of the PTCL (Reorganisation) Act, 1996?.Where this duty is assigned to Board of Trustees Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust (PTET) under Section 46(d) of the PTCL (Reorganisation) Act, 1996

5. Whether the Federa Ministry of IT & Telecommunication's inaction constitutes a miscarriage of justice?

4. Grounds for Petition

A. Violation of Pension Laws & Supreme Court Precedents

9. The Supreme Court of Pakistan, in CPLA-287/2023, declared that PTCL's 20-year requirement for pension eligibility is illegal and void.

10. The deceased completed more than 10 years of service, thereby meeting the legal threshold for pension entitlement under CSR 474AA.

B. Unlawful Denial of Family Pension

11. The Federal Pension Rules (Rule 4.1 & 4.2) expressly provide for family pension, which PTCL and the Respondents have unlawfully denied, despite its mandatory nature.

12. The Petitioner's constitutional right to livelihood (Article 9) has been violated due to this arbitrary refusal.

C. Constitutional and Legal Violations

13. The denial of pension violates Article 4 (right to due process), Article 8 (protection against arbitrary laws), Article 25 (right to equal treatment), and Article 27 (employment equality) of the Constitution.

14. The PTCL (Reorganisation) Act, 1996, under Section 36(2), prohibits PTCL from modifying employees' service benefits, making PTCL's policy illegal.

5. Relief Sought

In light of the above, the Petitioner humbly prays that this Honorable Court may be pleased to:

1. Declare that the Petitioner, as the legal heir of the deceased, is entitled to family pension under Federal Pension Rules (Rule 4.1 & 4.2) and CSR 474AA.

2. Direct PTCL and AGPR to immediately release all pensionary benefits and family pension from the date of death, along with statutory interest.

3. Declare PTCL's 20-year service requirement illegal and set aside all policies restricting pensionary rights.

4. Hold PTCL, Ministry of IT & Telecommunication, and AGPR accountable for their failure to comply with the law.

5. Award compensation to the Petitioner for financial hardship and mental distress caused by the unlawful withholding of pension benefits.

6. Initiate contempt proceedings against PTCL officials for defying the Supreme Court's judgment in CPLA-287/2023.

7. Grant any other relief deemed just and appropriate by this Honorable Court.

6. Interim Relief (If Needed)

Pending the final disposal of this petition, the Petitioner further prays for:

• An immediate injunction directing PTCL to provisionally release family pension payments.

• A restraining order preventing PTCL from taking any adverse action against the Petitioner's claim.

7. Affidavit of Truthfulness

I, [Your Name], do hereby solemnly affirm that the contents of this petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Filed By:

[Your Name]

Petitioner

CNIC No: [XXXXX-XXXXXXX-X]

Contact No: [XXXX-XXXXXXX]

Filed Through Counsel:

[Lawyer's Name]

Advocate High Court

[Law Firm Name]

[Lawyer's Contact Details]

Date of Filing: [Insert Date]

Place: [City Name]

Key Strengths of This Petition:

✔ Legal Notice Included – Strengthens the case by proving due process was followed.

✔ Comprehensive Legal Basis – Includes all relevant laws and Supreme Court precedents.

✔ Strong Constitutional Grounds – Highlights fundamental rights violations.

✔ Contempt Proceedings – Adds legal pressure for compliance.

Sent from my iPad