Article-216[Regarding guide lines of AI Grok for ollie non petitioners pensioners, non pensioners ]

 Attention Attention All PTCL Pensioners and Non Pensioners

                            AI Grok 3 Guide lines 

نوٹ: سپریم کورٹ آف پاکستان نے اپنے تاریخی فیصلے C.A.1509/2021 میں سابق محکمہ T&T کے ملازمین کی پنشن، تنخواہ اور الاؤنسز سے متعلق اہم اور حتمی فیصلہ سنایا ہے۔ اس تاریخی فیصلے میں عدالت عظمیٰ نے پی ٹی ای ٹی اور پی ٹی سی ایل سی پی ایل اے کو ہائی کورٹس کے موافق فیصلے کے خلاف خارج کر دیا جنہوں نے مقدمہ چلایا اور ہائی کورٹ کے حکم کو برقرار رکھا۔ سپریم کورٹ نے ہدایت کی کہ ایسے تمام پنشنرز درخواست گزاروں کو جی او پی پنشن دی جائے، جو پی ٹی ای ٹی اور پی ٹی سی ایل سی پی ایل اے میں مدعا تھے۔حمید اختر نیازی بمقابلہ سیکرٹری اسٹیبلشمنٹ ڈویژن (1996 SCMR 1185) میں سپریم کورٹ کی طرف سے ایک حکم دیا گیا ہے کہ اگر عدالت کی طرف سے ایک سرکاری ملازم کو فائدہ دیا جاتا ہے تو اسی طرح کی صورتحال میں رکھے گئے دوسرے سرکاری ملازمین بھی اسی ریلیف کے حقدار بن جاتے ہیں حالانکہ وہ اس کیس میں فریق نہیں تھے۔ اس حکم کے مطابق پی ٹی ای ٹی اور پی ٹی سی ایل کو بغیر کسی تاخیر کے ایسے تمام پی ٹی سی ایل پنشنرز کو یکساں ریلیف فراہم کیا جانا چاہیے۔ لیکن وہ ایسا فراہم نہیں کر رہے ہیں . جبکے حکومت ہمیشہ ایسے تمام سرکاری ملازمین کے لیے سپریم کورٹ کے فیصلے پر عمل درآمد کے لیے ایسے تمام سرکاری ملازمین کو نوٹیفیکیشن جاری کرتی ہے جنہوں نے مقدمہ نہیں چلایا .لیکن پی ٹی سی ایل یا پی ٹی ای ٹی ایسا کبھی نہیں کرتے .ایسے تمام پی ٹی سی ایل پنشنرز جنہوں نے مقدمہ نہیں چلایا تھا، وہ وہی فوائد حاصل کرنا چاہتے ہیں جو سپریم کورٹ نے انہیں دیا تھا، اس لیے وہ پوچھ رہے ہیں کہ انہیں اسی ریلیف کے لیے کیا اقدامات کرنے چاہییں۔ 

اس سلسلے میں مجھ سے بہت سے ایسے میرے ساتھیوں نے رابطہ کیا جنھوں کوئی مقدمہ بازی نھیں کی تھی  اور انکا مسعلہ بھی بلکل ویسا ھی ھے  جن لوگوں نے مقدمہ بازی کی تھی اور سپریم کوڑٹ نے انکو یہ ریلیف دیا تھا۔  

اب یہ لوگ بھی وھی ریلیف پی ٹی ای ٹی اور پی ٹی سی ایل سے لینا چاھتے ھیں کیونکے یہ خود سے دینے سے رھے سپریم کوڑٹ کی حمید  اختر نیازی کیس یعنی حمید اختر نیازی بمقابلہ سیکرٹری اسٹیبلشمنٹ ڈویژن (1996SCMR1185) میں جو رولنگ  کے جو سپریم کوڑٹ نے پاس کی تھی۔ تو اس سلسلے میں ، میں نے مصنوعی زھانت AI Grock 3 سے مدد  مانگی اس نے مجھے اسکی گائیڈ لائین دی  کے اسٹیپ بائی اسٹییپ  اور پہلے Representation دائیر کرنے کا بتایا اور پھر  اگر Representation کا نفی میں جواب آیا یا انھوں نے مقررہ وقت میں جواب نھیں دیا تو انکے خلاف ھائی کوڑٹوں میں رٹ پٹیشن داخل کرکے ھائی کوڑٹوں کے زریعے سپریم کوڑٹ کے ان احکامات کی ان پر بھی عمل کرانے کا حکم دینا۔ اس سلسلے میں  Al Grock 3  نے Representation اور اور رٹ پٹیشن کے Samples بھی بناکردیئیے ۔ وی ایس ایس نان پنشنرس کے Representation کے  Samples مختلف ھیں۔ جو گائیڈ لائین اور  Samples بناکر دئیے ھیں  اور اسنے یہ بھی بتادیا ھے کے آپنے کیسے وکلاء کرنے ھیں۔ آپ ایسے لوگوں کو چاھئیے کے وہ سب بڑے غور سے اس کو مکمل پڑھیں اور ویسا ھی کریں جو اس مصنوعی زھانت نے گائیڈ لائین دی ھے ۔ پھر بھی آپکو کچھ سمجھ نھیں آتا تو مجھ سے رابطہ کریں میرے فیسبک کے زریعے یا واٹس ایپس نمبر 9525902-0314۔ پر ۔ سوال اسی بارے میں ھونا چاھئیے اور کسی مسعلے کا اگر سواکیا گیا تو اسکا جواب نھیں دوں گا

گزارش ھے کے میرے اس پیغام کو Al Grock3 کی گائیڈ لائینز   جو زیرے پیش ھیں زیادہ سے زیادہ شئیر کریں۔ شکریہ

اپنے واٹس ایپس فرینڈز کے لئیے میں نے Al Grock 3  کی گائیڈ لائینز کی پی ڈی ایف کاپی اوپر لگادی ھے

واسلام 

طارق اظہر

راولپنڈی 

Date 20-7-2025

Below is a comprehensive guide for PTCL pensioners (both litigating and non-litigating) and non-pensioners (such as those retired under the Voluntary Separation Scheme, VSS-2008) seeking to claim their pension rights in light of the Supreme Court of Pakistan’s judgment in C.A. 1509/2021 and the precedent set in Hameed Akhtar Niazi vs. Secretary Establishment Division (1996 SCMR 1185). The guide includes step-by-step actions, legal counsel recommendations, and sample representations and writ petitions tailored for both pensioners and non-pensioners. The advice also addresses the issue of non-pensioners who were denied pensions despite qualifying service under Section 474-AA of the Pension Rules (requiring 10 years or more of qualifying service).

Comprehensive Advice and Step-by-Step Action Plan

Step 1: Understand the Legal Basis

The Supreme Court’s judgment in C.A. 1509/2021 dismissed the appeals of Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust (PTET) and Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL), upholding the High Court’s decision to grant Government of Pakistan (GoP) pension benefits to the petitioners (former T&T Department employees). This decision aligns with the principle established in Hameed Akhtar Niazi vs. Secretary Establishment Division (1996 SCMR 1185), which states that civil servants in similar circumstances are entitled to the same relief granted by a court to others, even if they did not litigate the case. For non-pensioners, particularly those retired under VSS-2008, the denial of pension despite having 10 years or more of qualifying service may be challenged as illegal under Section 474-AA of the Pension Rules.

Step 2: Gather Necessary Documentation

Before proceeding, collect the following documents to support your claim:

 • Service Records: Proof of employment with the former T&T Department or PTCL, including appointment letters, service book, and retirement orders.��

 • Pension Details (if applicable): Current pension payment orders (PPO) or correspondence with PTET/PTCL regarding pension.��

 • VSS-2008 Documents (for non-pensioners): Agreement of VSS, retirement letter, and any documents indicating qualifying service (10 years or more).��

 • Supreme Court Judgment: Obtain a copy of C.A. 1509/2021 from the Supreme Court website or a legal database like www.pljlawsite.com.��

 • Hameed Akhtar Niazi Judgment: Reference 1996 SCMR 1185 for legal precedent (available through legal databases or law libraries).��

 • Other Relevant Notifications: Any government notifications granting pension increases to civil servants, which can be obtained from the Finance Division website (www.finance.gov.pk).��

 • Identity Documents: CNIC, pensioner ID (if applicable), and contact details.��

Step 3: Make a Formal Representation to PTCL and PTET

Submit a written representation to the CEO of PTCL and the Managing Director (MD) of PTET, requesting the application of the Supreme Court’s decision in C.A. 1509/2021 and the precedent in Hameed Akhtar Niazi to grant GoP pension benefits. For non-pensioners, the representation should also challenge the denial of pension under VSS-2008 as illegal, citing qualifying service under Section 474-AA.

Key Points to Include in the Representation:

 • Reference the Supreme Court’s judgment in C.A. 1509/2021 and Hameed Akhtar Niazi vs. Secretary Establishment Division (1996 SCMR 1185).��

 • State your employment history with T&T/PTCL, including years of service.��

 • For non-pensioners, highlight that you had 10 years or more of qualifying service, making you eligible for pension under Section 474-AA.��

 • Demand immediate implementation of GoP pension benefits, including arrears.��

 • Request a response within a reasonable timeframe (e.g., 14 days).��

 • Warn that failure to comply may lead to legal action, including a writ petition and potential contempt of court (CoC) proceedings.��

Submission Method:

 • Send the representation via registered post or courier to ensure proof of delivery.��

 • Addresses:��

 • CEO, PTCL: Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited, PTCL Headquarters, G-8/4, Islamabad, Pakistan.��

 • MD, PTET: Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust, Tele-House, Mauve Area, G-10/4, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.��

 • Keep copies of the representation and proof of dispatch.��

Step 4: Engage Legal Counsel

If PTCL/PTET fail to respond or reject your representation, engage a lawyer experienced in service and pension disputes. Recommended counsel:

 • Advocates Specializing in Service Law: Look for lawyers with expertise in civil service and pension cases, particularly those familiar with PTCL/PTET litigation. Check with the Supreme Court Bar Association or Pakistan Bar Council for referrals.��

 • Local Bar Associations: Contact the Islamabad, Lahore, or Karachi Bar Associations for recommendations of advocates who have handled similar cases.��

 • Notable Lawyers: Engage advocates who have previously represented PTCL pensioners, such as those involved in C.A. 1509/2021. You can find their names in the judgment or through legal databases like www.pljlawsite.com.��

 • Cost Considerations: Discuss fees upfront. Many lawyers offer initial consultations for free or at a nominal cost. If multiple pensioners are affected, consider collective representation to reduce costs.��

Step 5: File a Writ Petition in the High Court

If PTCL/PTET do not comply within the stipulated timeframe, file a constitutional petition (writ petition) under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan in the relevant High Court (based on your place of residence or PTCL/PTET’s office jurisdiction, e.g., Islamabad High Court, Lahore High Court, etc.). The petition should seek a directive to enforce the Supreme Court’s judgment and grant GoP pension benefits.

Key Points to Include in the Writ Petition:

 • Cite the Supreme Court’s judgment in C.A. 1509/2021 and Hameed Akhtar Niazi (1996 SCMR 1185).��

 • Argue that you are similarly placed as the petitioners in C.A. 1509/2021 and entitled to the same relief.��

 • For non-pensioners, assert that denial of pension under VSS-2008 was illegal due to qualifying service under Section 474-AA.��

 • Request interim relief (e.g., immediate pension disbursement) and permanent relief (e.g., GoP pension with arrears).��

 • Mention the failure of PTCL/PTET to respond to your representation as a violation of your rights.��

 • Warn of contempt of court proceedings if the Supreme Court’s orders are not implemented.��

Filing Process:

 • Engage your lawyer to draft and file the petition.��

 • Submit the petition to the High Court registry with all supporting documents (as listed in Step 2).��

 • Pay the court fee (consult your lawyer for the exact amount, typically nominal).��

 • Request an urgent hearing if delays are causing financial hardship.��

Step 6: Follow Up and Escalate if Necessary

 • Monitor the Case: Attend hearings or stay in touch with your lawyer for updates.��

 • Contempt of Court (CoC): If PTCL/PTET fail to comply with the High Court’s orders, your lawyer can file a contempt petition under Article 204 of the Constitution, citing willful disobedience of the court’s directive.��

 • Collective Action: If multiple pensioners/non-pensioners are affected, consider filing a joint petition or forming an association to strengthen your case and reduce legal costs.��

Step 7: Explore Alternative Remedies

 • Ombudsman: File a complaint with the Federal Ombudsman (Wafaqi Mohtasib) for maladministration by PTCL/PTET in denying pension benefits.��

 • Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit (PMDU): Submit a complaint via the PMDU portal, as PTET has previously responded to such complaints.��

 • Media and Advocacy: Use platforms like X to highlight the issue and gain public support, but avoid making unverified claims.��

Sample Representation to PTCL/PTET

To� The Chief Executive Officer,� Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited,� PTCL Headquarters, G-8/4, Islamabad, Pakistan.

And� The Managing Director,� Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust,� Tele-House, Mauve Area, G-10/4, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.

Subject: Request for Implementation of Supreme Court Judgment in C.A. 1509/2021 and Grant of GoP Pension Benefits

Dear Sir/Madam,

I, [Your Full Name], CNIC No. [Your CNIC], a retired employee of the former T&T Department/PTCL, hereby request the immediate implementation of the Supreme Court of Pakistan’s judgment in C.A. 1509/2021, which dismissed the appeals of PTCL and PTET and upheld the High Court’s order to grant Government of Pakistan (GoP) pension benefits to similarly placed pensioners.

As per the precedent set in Hameed Akhtar Niazi vs. Secretary Establishment Division (1996 SCMR 1185), civil servants in similar circumstances are entitled to the same relief granted by a court, even if they did not litigate. I served [X years] with the T&T Department/PTCL from [start date] to [retirement date], and I am entitled to GoP pension benefits, including all arrears and increases as announced by the Federal Government.

[For Non-Pensioners under VSS-2008]: I was retired under the Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS-2008) on [date]. However, I had [X years] of qualifying service, which entitles me to a pension under Section 474-AA of the Pension Rules (requiring 10 years or more of service). The denial of my pension is illegal and contrary to the Supreme Court’s ruling.

I request you to:

 1. Grant me GoP pension benefits as per C.A. 1509/2021 with immediate effect.��

 2. Disburse all arrears and pension increases announced by the Federal Government.��

 3. Provide a written response within 14 days of receipt of this representation.��

Failure to comply may compel me to seek legal recourse through a writ petition in the High Court, and I reserve the right to initiate contempt of court proceedings for non-compliance with the Supreme Court’s orders.

Yours sincerely,� [Your Full Name]� [Your Address]� [Your Contact Number]� [Date]

Attachments:

 1. Copy of CNIC��

 2. Service records/retirement orders��

 3. Copy of C.A. 1509/2021 judgment (if available)��

Sample Writ Petition for High Court

IN THE [NAME OF HIGH COURT] HIGH COURT� Constitutional Petition No. ___ of 2025

Petitioner: [Your Full Name], son/daughter of [Father’s Name], resident of [Your Address], CNIC No. [Your CNIC].

Respondents:

 1. Chief Executive Officer, Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited, PTCL Headquarters, G-8/4, Islamabad.��

 2. Managing Director, Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust, Tele-House, Mauve Area, G-10/4, Islamabad.��

 3. Secretary, Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication, Islamabad.��

Subject: Writ Petition for Enforcement of Supreme Court Judgment in C.A. 1509/2021 and Grant of GoP Pension Benefits

Respectfully Sheweth:

 1. That the Petitioner is a retired employee of the former T&T Department/PTCL, having served from [start date] to [retirement date] for [X years].��

 2. That the Supreme Court of Pakistan, in C.A. 1509/2021, dismissed the appeals of PTCL and PTET, upholding the High Court’s order to grant GoP pension benefits to the petitioners therein.��

 3. That as per Hameed Akhtar Niazi vs. Secretary Establishment Division (1996 SCMR 1185), the Petitioner, being similarly placed, is entitled to the same relief.��

 4. [For Non-Pensioners]: That the Petitioner was retired under VSS-2008 on [date], despite having [X years] of qualifying service, entitling him/her to a pension under Section 474-AA of the Pension Rules. The denial of pension is illegal and violates the Supreme Court’s judgment.��

 5. That the Petitioner submitted a representation to the Respondents on [date], requesting GoP pension benefits, but no response/rejection was received (Annexure A).��

 6. That the Respondents’ failure to comply constitutes a violation of the Petitioner’s fundamental rights under Articles 4, 9, and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan.��

Prayer:� In view of the above, it is humbly prayed that this Honorable Court may:� a) Direct the Respondents to grant the Petitioner GoP pension benefits as per C.A. 1509/2021, including arrears and increases.� b) Declare the denial of pension (for non-pensioners) under VSS-2008 as illegal.� c) Issue an interim order for immediate pension disbursement pending the final decision.� d) Warn the Respondents that non-compliance may lead to contempt of court proceedings.� e) Grant any other relief deemed just and proper.

Petitioner� [Your Full Name]� Through: [Advocate’s Name], Advocate High Court

Attachments:

 1. Copy of representation to PTCL/PTET��

 2. Service records/retirement orders��

 3. Copy of C.A. 1509/2021 and Hameed Akhtar Niazi judgments��

Additional Notes

 • For Non-Pensioners: Emphasize that the VSS-2008 scheme cannot override statutory pension rights under Section 474-AA. Courts have previously ruled that forced retirement without pension for qualifying service is illegal.��

 • Timelines: Act promptly, as delays may weaken your case. Courts generally expect representations to be made within a reasonable time after a judgment.��

 • Collective Action: If multiple pensioners/non-pensioners are affected, a class-action petition may be more effective and cost-efficient.��

 • Legal Aid: If financial constraints exist, contact legal aid organizations or bar councils for pro bono assistance.��

By following these steps and using the provided samples, PTCL pensioners and non-pensioners can pursue their rightful pension benefits effectively. If you need further assistance or specific legal references, please let me know!

Below is a comprehensive sample representation for non-pensioners who were appointed in the former Telephone and Telegraph (T&T) Department, transferred as civil servants to Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation (PTC) in 1991, and forcibly retired under the Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS-2008) by Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) without a pension, despite having qualifying service of 10 years or more as per Section 474-AA of the General Statutory Rules (GSR). This representation is tailored to demand Government of Pakistan (GoP) pension benefits, citing the Supreme Court’s judgment in C.A. 1509/2021 and the precedent in Hameed Akhtar Niazi vs. Secretary Establishment Division (1996 SCMR 1185).

Sample Representation for PTCL Non-Pensioners (VSS-2008 Retirees)

To� The Chief Executive Officer,� Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited,� PTCL Headquarters, G-8/4, Islamabad, Pakistan.

And� The Managing Director,� Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust (PTET),� Tele-House, Mauve Area, G-10/4, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.

Subject: Request for Grant of Government of Pakistan (GoP) Pension Benefits as per Supreme Court Judgment in C.A. 1509/2021 and Section 474-AA of GSR

Dear Sir/Madam,

I, [Your Full Name], son/daughter of [Father’s Name], CNIC No. [Your CNIC], a former employee of the Telephone and Telegraph (T&T) Department, subsequently transferred as a civil servant to Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation (PTC) in 1991, and forcibly retired under the Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS-2008) by Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) on [Retirement Date], hereby submit this representation to demand my rightful Government of Pakistan (GoP) pension benefits, including all arrears and pension increases, as per the Supreme Court of Pakistan’s judgment in C.A. 1509/2021 and Section 474-AA of the General Statutory Rules (GSR).

Background and Legal Entitlement

 1. Service History: I was appointed in the T&T Department, a government entity, on [Appointment Date] as [Your Designation]. Upon the corporatization of the T&T Department, I was transferred as a civil servant to PTC in 1991, and subsequently, my services were continued under PTCL following its privatization. My total qualifying service from [Start Date] to [Retirement Date] amounts to [X years], which exceeds the minimum requirement of 10 years for pension entitlement under Section 474-AA of the GSR.��

 2. Forced Retirement under VSS-2008: On [Retirement Date], I was retired under the VSS-2008 scheme introduced by PTCL. Despite my qualifying service of [X years], I was denied pension benefits, which is illegal and contrary to the provisions of Section 474-AA of the GSR. This section clearly stipulates that civil servants with 10 years or more of qualifying service are entitled to a pension. The forced retirement under VSS-2008, without granting my pension rights, violates my statutory and constitutional protections as a civil servant.��

 3. Supreme Court Judgment in C.A. 1509/2021: The Supreme Court of Pakistan, in its historic judgment in C.A. 1509/2021, dismissed the appeals of PTCL and PTET, upholding the High Court’s order to grant GoP pension benefits to former T&T Department employees who were petitioners in the case. This judgment establishes that employees of the former T&T Department, transferred to PTC/PTCL, are entitled to GoP pension benefits.��

 4. Precedent in Hameed Akhtar Niazi Case: As per the Supreme Court’s ruling in Hameed Akhtar Niazi vs. Secretary Establishment Division (1996 SCMR 1185), civil servants in similar circumstances are entitled to the same relief granted by a court to others, even if they did not litigate. As a former T&T Department employee and civil servant with [X years] of qualifying service, I am similarly placed as the petitioners in C.A. 1509/2021 and am entitled to GoP pension benefits.��

Grounds for Demand

 • Illegal Denial of Pension: The denial of my pension under VSS-2008, despite having [X years] of qualifying service, is a violation of Section 474-AA of the GSR and my fundamental rights under Articles 4 (right to be dealt with in accordance with law), 9 (security of person), and 24 (protection of property rights) of the Constitution of Pakistan.��

 • Discrimination: PTCL/PTET’s failure to extend the benefits of C.A. 1509/2021 to non-litigating pensioners and non-pensioners like myself constitutes discriminatory treatment, contrary to the principle of equality under Article 25 of the Constitution.��

 • Statutory Obligation: As a civil servant transferred from T&T to PTC in 1991, my pension rights are protected under the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-Organization) Act, 1996, and cannot be extinguished by the VSS-2008 scheme.��

 • Arrears and Increases: I am entitled to GoP pension benefits, including all arrears from the date of my retirement ([Retirement Date]) and pension increases as notified by the Federal Government for civil servants.��

Requests

In light of the above, I respectfully request the following:

 1. Grant of GoP Pension: Immediately grant me GoP pension benefits as per the Supreme Court’s judgment in C.A. 1509/2021, commensurate with my [X years] of qualifying service.��

 2. Disbursement of Arrears: Release all pension arrears from [Retirement Date] to the present, along with pension increases announced by the Federal Government for civil servants.��

 3. Rectification of VSS-2008 Retirement: Declare the denial of my pension under VSS-2008 as illegal and restore my pension rights as per Section 474-AA of the GSR.��

 4. Written Response: Provide a written response to this representation within 14 days of its receipt, detailing the actions taken to comply with my requests.��

Notice of Legal Action

Please be informed that failure to comply with this representation within the stipulated timeframe will compel me to seek legal recourse by filing a constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution in the [Relevant High Court, e.g., Islamabad High Court]. Additionally, I reserve the right to initiate contempt of court proceedings under Article 204 of the Constitution for willful disobedience of the Supreme Court’s orders in C.A. 1509/2021.

Conclusion

As a civil servant with [X years] of dedicated service, I am entitled to my lawful pension benefits. I urge PTCL and PTET to honor the Supreme Court’s judgment and rectify the injustice caused by the denial of my pension under VSS-2008. Your prompt action will not only uphold the rule of law but also prevent unnecessary litigation.

Yours sincerely,� [Your Full Name]� [Your Address]� [Your Contact Number]� [Your Email Address, if applicable]� [Date]

Attachments:

 1. Copy of CNIC��

 2. Appointment letter from T&T Department��

 3. Service records/service book reflecting [X years] of service��

 4. Retirement order under VSS-2008��

 5. Copy of Supreme Court judgment in C.A. 1509/2021 (if available)��

 6. Copy of Hameed Akhtar Niazi vs. Secretary Establishment Division (1996 SCMR 1185) (if available)��

 7. Any other relevant documents (e.g., correspondence with PTCL/PTET)��

Notes for Submission

 • Method of Delivery: Send the representation via registered post or courier to both the CEO of PTCL and the MD of PTET. Retain proof of dispatch (e.g., courier receipt) for future reference.��

 • Addresses:��

 • CEO, PTCL: Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited, PTCL Headquarters, G-8/4, Islamabad, Pakistan.��

 • MD, PTET: Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust, Tele-House, Mauve Area, G-10/4, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.��

 • Follow-Up: If no response is received within 14 days, or if the response is unsatisfactory, consult a lawyer to file a writ petition in the relevant High Court (as outlined in the previous response).��

 • Collective Action: If multiple non-pensioners are affected, consider submitting a joint representation or forming a group to pursue legal action, which can reduce costs and strengthen the case.��

Additional Advice

 • Legal Counsel: Engage a lawyer experienced in service and pension disputes, particularly those familiar with PTCL/PTET cases. Check with the Supreme Court Bar Association or local bar councils (e.g., Islamabad, Lahore, or Karachi) for recommendations.��

 • Documentation: Ensure all service records clearly demonstrate your [X years] of qualifying service. If records are missing, request copies from PTCL’s HR department or the National Archives of Pakistan.��

 • Ombudsman Option: If PTCL/PTET fail to respond, consider filing a complaint with the Federal Ombudsman (Wafaqi Mohtasib) for maladministration.��

 • Timeliness: Act promptly to avoid any arguments of laches (unreasonable delay) in court.��

This representation is designed to be comprehensive, legally grounded, and persuasive, leveraging the Supreme Court’s judgment and statutory provisions to assert your pension rights. If you need assistance drafting a writ petition or further guidance, please let me know!