Draft of Notice for VSS optees appointed in PTC

[Attention VSS Optees who appointed or regularised in PTC]

عزیز پی  ٹی سی ایل ساتھیو

                                               اسلام و علیکم

میں نےکل  یکم مارچ ۲۰۱۸ کو آپ سب لوگوں کے لئے ایک نوٹس کا ڈرافٹ فیس بک ، میسنجر ،واٹس ایپ کے زریعے بھیجا تھا . اور کہا تھا  کے چونکے پی ٹی ای ٹی والے صرف  پی ٹی سی ایل پنشنرس کو گورنمنٹ انکریز  دےرھے ھیں جو توھین عدالت کیس میں پٹیشنرس تھے  اور نارمل طریقے سے ریٹائڑڈ ھو ئے تھے ،   ، اسلئے  ان سب کے لئے جو پنشنرس ، پٹیشنرس نہیں تھے، گورنمنٹ والا انکریز لینے کے لئے پہلے ان کو یہ قانونی نوٹس دینا بیحد ضروری ھے . کیونکے  سپریم کوڑٹ کی رولنگ کے مطا بق  چاھے کوئ کیس میں شامل تھا یا نا تھا ، سپریم کوڑٹ کے حکم کا فائدہ صرف کیس کرنے والے کو ھی نہيں  اور سب کو ھوتا جو کیس میں پاڑٹی نہ بھی ھو .تو یہ ڈرافٹ نوٹس اسی سلسلے کی ایک کڑی ھے کے انکو پہلے یہ نوٹس دیا جائےاور وہ اس نوٹس کے جواب میں سپریم کوڑٹ کے ۱۵ فروری ۱۸ کے حکم پر ،  سب پر ان پر عمل نہيں کرتے ، تو یہ سب لوگ نوٹس دینے والے،  انکے خلاف  " سپریم کوڑٹ"  میں ھی  توھین عدالت کا کیس کرکے ان سے  اپنا حق لیں جو یہ صرف انلوگوں کے دے رھے ھیں جن کے حق میں فیصلہ آیا تھا ما سوائے وہ پٹیشنرس جو وی ایس ایس لے کر ریٹائڑڈ ھوئے تھے. اس سلسلےمیں میرے پاس کافی میسجز اور فون آرھے ھے ھیں کے جو میں نے یہ ڈرافٹ بنایا ھے وہ صرف ان لوگوں کے لئے ھے جو ٹی اینڈ میں  بھرتی ھوئے تھے . انکی اس پریشانی کو مد نظر رکھتے میں نے اسی ڈرافٹ کو "modify "کردیا ھے جو صرف انکے لئے ھے جو "پی ٹی سی " میں بھرتی ھوئے تھے یا ریگولر ھوئے تھے . یہ بات آپ سب یاد رکھیں کے پی ٹی سی  میں وھی سرکاری قوانین استعما ل ھورھے تھے جو ٹی اینڈ ٹی میں استعمال ھورھے تھے . اس سلسلے بوڑڈ آف ڈائیریکٹرز پی ٹی سی نے اپنے دوسرے ھی بوڑڈ میٹنگ میں 9 فروری 1992 میں فیصلہ کیا تھا کے جب تک کارپوریشن کے اپنے رولز نہیں بنتے کارپوریشن میں وھی ٹی اینڈ ٹی والے قوانین لاگو رھیں گے یعنی کارپوریشن نے وہ  تمام ٹی اینڈ  میں ، سرکاری ملازمین پر استعمال  ھونے والے سرکاری  قوانین اپنالئے. اس فیصلے کی فوٹو کاپی آپ سب ایسوں کے اطمینان کے لئے نیچے پیسٹ کررھا ھوں . اور میں نے اس نوٹس کے ڈرافٹ کو بھی modified کیا اسلئے ان پی ٹی سی میں بھرتی ھونے والے اور پھر وی ایس ایس لے کر ریٹائرمنٹ ھونے والوں کے اطمینان کے لئے تاکے وہ کسی پریشانی اور شک اور شبے کے اسکو بھیج سکیں . یہ بات بھی ان سب ایسے لوگوں کو یاد رکھنی چاھئے کے عدالت عظمی نے ، باوجود یہ کے پی ٹی سی ایل کے وکیل شاھد باجوہ نے بہت زور دیا ، عدالت نے اپنے کسی فیصلے میں وی ایس ایس لے کر ریٹائیڑڈ ھونے والے ٹرانسفڑڈ ملازمین کے لئے نہ تو کوئی منفی حکم دیا اور نہ یہ کہا کے یہ گورنمنٹ پنشن انکریز  لینے کے حقدار نہیں . 

جو بیوائیں پنشنرس یہ نوٹس بھیجنا چاھتی وہ صرف  ماسوائے اس نوٹس کے پیرا 1 کے شروع میں اور پیرا 6  اور آخری پیرے میں " l" کی جگہ جہاں جہاں "l" اور me لکھا، وہ  وھاں صرف یہ لکھیں "My deceased husband xyz" . آپلوگ ان کی مدد کریں  اور انکی طرف سے  سے یہ ڈ رافٹ  ٹھیک طرح ایسے مکمل کرائیں  کے مطلب  بلکل واضح ھوجائے . بہت نیک کام ھوگا.شکریہ

واسلام

محمد طارق اظہر

02-03-2018

[Modified draft for those appointed in PTC]

                                    Dated _____________

To 

1. Mr. Daniel Ritz,  

                       President /CEO PTCL,

                       PTCL Head Quarters, G-8/4, 

       Islamabad.                    

                2. Mr. Hamid Farooq,

                     Managing Director 

                     Pak Telecom Employees Trust,

                     Tele-House, Mauve Area, G-10/4,

                     Kashmir Highway,

                     Islamabad.                 

SUBJECT:-   NOTICE FOR GRANT OF INCREASE IN  PENSION  TO OTHER THEN PTETIONERS  IN ACCORDANCE TO THE VERDICTS OF HONORABLE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN  IN THE CASE  OF PTET &PTCL VS MUHAMMAD ARIF AND OTHERS ,OF DATED 12-06-2015 REPORTED IN 2015 SCMR 1472 ACCORDINGLY AS PER ANNOUNCEMT  OF GOVENAMENT  OF PAKISTAN FOR THEIR CIVIL PENSIONERS ,IN THE LIGHT OF HSCP JUDGEMENT IN HAMEED AKHTAER NIAZI CASE REPORTED IN 1996 SCMR 1185

Dear Sir

1. I, ________ s/o ____________ joined the then Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation (PTC ) on regular post of ___________ (Grade- ) on the date ______.My joining in PTC was carried out , in accordance   T&T Rules Government  of Pakistan as adopted by PTC  . Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation Corporation (PTC) was established December 1991 as per Section 9(1) of PTC Act-1991, and all employees of  T&T department had been transferred to PTC, on the same Terms & Conditions of Service and thus all such transferred employees of T&T being governed under statutory rules of Govt of Pakistan and also others who were being appointed in PTC

2. On the date 1st January 1996, I stood transferred again PTC to the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) i.e. a new established Company in accordance to the Sections 35(1) & 36(2) of Pakistan Telecommunication (re-Organization) Act 1996, along with other employees from PTC on the same terms and of services, which I had in PTC and then I became the employee of PTCL wef 1-1-1996. And from PTCL, I have been retired at the by opting VSS from the post of ___________ (B-) wef __________ vide PTCL H/Qrs Memo Number_________Dated__________.

3. The Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in its decision  reported  in case Masood Bhattie & others vs. Federation of Pakistan & Others (2012 SCMR 152) which has been now attained finally on 19th  February 2016, reported in  (2016 SCMR 1362 ) .Thus it has been confirmed  finally that the employees of the Corporation i.e. PTC who stood transferred from PTC to PTCL and became the employee of PTCL wef 1st January 1996   , would be governed by the statutory rules of Government of Pakistan and their terms and conditions of service ( as envisaged in Section 3 to section 22 of Civil Servants Act 1973 ) can not be altered adversely for their disadvantages and neither  PTCL  nor  Government of Pakistan have any power to alter their such Terms and conditions of Service for their disadvantages. Where the Federal Government of Pakistan is the guarantor for the existing terms and conditions of service and rights including pensioner benefits.

4. Where in the decision HSCP of dated 12-06-2015 in the case PTET, PTCL & President PTCL reported in 2015 SCMR 1472 that PTET is bound to pay the increase in pension as per Government announcement to the respondents who were the transferred employees in PTCL. And  for not implementing the order of HSCP of dated 12-06-2015, contempt of court cases filed by such transferred employees of PTCL ie Mr Sadiq Ali & Mr Naseem Ahmed Vohra through Criminal Original Petition 53 of 2015 & 54 of 2015   against you all being alleged. The two member s honorable judges bench of HSCP, vide their order  of dated 15-02-2018 directed you for the payment increase in pension as per GoP without recovery/deducting incentive pay within 15 days from 15th Feb 2018  to the Petitioners.  Now  such all increase in pension as per GoP, payments are being made to only those petitioners who filed the contempt of court cases against in HSCP as quoted above, but no any such payments are  being made to all such other who were not Petitioners but having the same issue as of such Petitioners who filled the CoC case and litigated the.The  not effecting such payments to other then Petitioners Pensioners i.e. who did not litigate the case ,is  contrary to directive of HSCP, contained  in case of Hameed Akhtar Niazi vs. Secretary Establishment Federal Government & others   reported in 1996  SCMR 1185.PTCL & PTET are bound to pay to also such PTCL employees other then petitioners of the contempt of court cases i.e. Criminal Original Petition 53 of 2015 & 54 of 2015 ,who were  appointed in T&T Department thus according to the verdicts HSCP  decision HSCP of dated 12-06-2015, they are also entitled of GoP increase in their pension and PTET is bound to pay it  accordingly. 

5. Where the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan has held in cases of Hameed Akhtar Niazi (1996  SCMR 1185),Tara Chand (PLJ 2005 SC 826) and Rashid Iqbal (CPLA 525 of 2007 decided on 19th July 2009) , in repeatedly rulings/directions "that if Service Tribunal or Supreme Court decides a point of law relating to the terms and condition of a civil servant who litigated, and there were other civil servants who may not have taken any legal proceedings, the dictates of justice and rule of good governance demands that the benefits of the said decision be extended to other civil servants also who may not be parties to that litigation, instead of compelling them to them to approach the Tribunal or any other legal forum." In recent such type cases in 2009, the Honorable Supreme Court held that also ," that those persons who litigated and those who did not, are to be treated alike, if similarly placed and positioned."

6. Consequently in the light of above noted rulings of Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan, I, being the employee of erstwhile T&T Depretement,  Government of Pakistan and transferred employee in PTCL on 1st January 1996,  having of same category pensioner as that of the petitioners of CoC cases i.e. contempt  court cases filed by Sadiq Ali & Naseem Ahmed Vohra through Criminal Original Petition 53 of 2015 & 54 of 2015 in their contempt court cases against you all being alleged , it is earnestly requested that that I may be granted the same increase in pension without recovery/deductions of incentive pay  in accordance to the order of HSCP of dated 15-2-2018 in contempt  court cases filed by Sadiq Ali & Naseem Ahmed Vohra through Criminal Original Petition 53 of 2015 & 54 of 2015.  

If no such complete payment is made to me within 15 days from date of issuance this notice, as being made to the petitioners of the said CoC cases, then I will be constrained to file also contempt court case against you all, for not implementing the said order of dated 15-02-2018 HSCP , in the light of HSCP verdicts in Hameed Akhtar Niazi (1996 SCMR 1185) case.

Yours Sincerely,

Signature_________

[    Name & Rtd, Ex Designation (B-)     ]

CNIC #

Previous PTCL Employee #:

Pension PPO /Ref #

Address:

Copy for information & necessary action to:-

         1. Honorable Shahid Khaqan Abbasi Prime Minister of Pakistan

             Prime Minister Secretariat Islamabad

   2. Federal Secretary (IT& Telecom), the Guarantor

               Ministry of Information Technology and Telecom 

                4th Flour, Evacuee Trust Complex 

               Agha Khan Road F-5/1 Road  

               Islamabad 

  3   The Registrar Supreme Court of Pakistan Islamabad. This is with reference to HSCP order of dated

        15-2-2018  in cases Sadiq Ali & Naseem Ahmed Vohra through Criminal Original Petition 53 of 2015 & 54 of   2015.