Fwd: Copy of CoC case filed by Naseeriuddin Ghori
Dear Friends
FYI also. Pl go through it and try to under stand my view of points.
Thanks
&
Regards
Muhammad Tariq Azhar
Muhammad Tariq Azhar
GM(Rtd) PTCL
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Tariq Azhar" <azhar.tariq@gmail.com>
Date: 10 Mar 2018 5:29 pm
Subject: Copy of CoC case filed by Naseeruddin Ghori
To: "Shabbirasst@yahoo.com" <Shabbirasst@yahoo.com>
Cc:
From: "Tariq Azhar" <azhar.tariq@gmail.com>
Date: 10 Mar 2018 5:29 pm
Subject: Copy of CoC case filed by Naseeruddin Ghori
To: "Shabbirasst@yahoo.com" <Shabbirasst@yahoo.com>
Cc:
Dear Shabbir Sb, fyi as desired.As a matter of fact , In this way the HSCP had to deal the case of CoC case ,filed by Naseem Vohra & Sadiq Ali .Mr Naseer Uddin Ghuri filed the CoC against President PTCL Walid Irshad and Farooq Awan Secrtary IT& Telcom for not implementing the order of HSC as given by three members judges benchin Masood Bhattie case on 7-10-2011. In which the HSCP had directed the PTCL for the payment dues as per GoP & promotion to Naseer Uddin Ghouri , with in one moth but PTCL ignored and did not pay any amount and they also did not promote Naseer Uddin Ghouri as directed by HSCP, the appeal of PTCL in this regard was already dismissed by HSCP in 2004.
On the hering date ie 8th August 2012 Naseer Uddin Ghuri CoC case when all alleged contemners were were present in the court, the Honourable EX CJ Iftikharar Chudhry had directed the alleged contemners ie Walid Irshad and Farooq Awan that he would hear the case after Jumma Prayers and by that time the payment and promotion as directed by HSCP ,should be made to Petitioner Nasir Ghuri. So all they rushed to PTCL H/Qrs and prepared the cheque of Rs 475000/- for his due amount and the same was given to Nasir Uddin Ghuri in the court and assured the court that his promotion would be done within one month by DPC and their council also requested unconditional pardon.
This is the way to deal the case of CoC , not in this way as was done by two members bench judges in Naseem Vohra and Sadiq Ali CoC case on 15-2-2018 .The whole order is also defective one , which was given as requested by Shahid Bajwa the learned council of alleged contemners .It is obsoletely a defective order as it is contrary to the order of "three members" bench of dated 12-6-2015 "that PTET is bound to pay the increase in pensions to the respondents who were appointed in T&T and then transferred to PTC and retired and then transferred to PTCL and retired".Where no such order was passed that such increase in pension not to be given who opted VSS and retired. The three member judges decision of 12-6-2015 is superior then two member judges of dated 15-2-2018 so why it is defective one and acceptable.Where the order of dated 12-06-2015 for only those respondents who retired normally but for also those who had been retired under VSS. In these respondents, the TPA ie Telecom Pakistan Association was also available who contested the case of all its members ie all pensioners in Pakistan.But order which was passed by HSCP two member judges on 15-2-2018 for only those who were the petitioners of the CoC retired normally hence defective one and also defective in this sense that it was not passed by larger bench of three members of bench who passed the order in favour of all pensioners on 12-6-2015.
Regards
Tariq
10-3-2012
Sent from Tariq's iPad from Rawalpindi Pakistan
On the hering date ie 8th August 2012 Naseer Uddin Ghuri CoC case when all alleged contemners were were present in the court, the Honourable EX CJ Iftikharar Chudhry had directed the alleged contemners ie Walid Irshad and Farooq Awan that he would hear the case after Jumma Prayers and by that time the payment and promotion as directed by HSCP ,should be made to Petitioner Nasir Ghuri. So all they rushed to PTCL H/Qrs and prepared the cheque of Rs 475000/- for his due amount and the same was given to Nasir Uddin Ghuri in the court and assured the court that his promotion would be done within one month by DPC and their council also requested unconditional pardon.
This is the way to deal the case of CoC , not in this way as was done by two members bench judges in Naseem Vohra and Sadiq Ali CoC case on 15-2-2018 .The whole order is also defective one , which was given as requested by Shahid Bajwa the learned council of alleged contemners .It is obsoletely a defective order as it is contrary to the order of "three members" bench of dated 12-6-2015 "that PTET is bound to pay the increase in pensions to the respondents who were appointed in T&T and then transferred to PTC and retired and then transferred to PTCL and retired".Where no such order was passed that such increase in pension not to be given who opted VSS and retired. The three member judges decision of 12-6-2015 is superior then two member judges of dated 15-2-2018 so why it is defective one and acceptable.Where the order of dated 12-06-2015 for only those respondents who retired normally but for also those who had been retired under VSS. In these respondents, the TPA ie Telecom Pakistan Association was also available who contested the case of all its members ie all pensioners in Pakistan.But order which was passed by HSCP two member judges on 15-2-2018 for only those who were the petitioners of the CoC retired normally hence defective one and also defective in this sense that it was not passed by larger bench of three members of bench who passed the order in favour of all pensioners on 12-6-2015.
Regards
Tariq
10-3-2012
Sent from Tariq's iPad from Rawalpindi Pakistan
--
Sent from Rawalpindi Pakistan via iPad
Sent from Rawalpindi Pakistan via iPad
Comments